There are cases where certain types of agreements do not automatically fall within the scope of Article 101 of the TFUE, for example. B: there are 5 restrictions that exclude the entire agreement from the interest of the settlement, even if the supplier and buyer`s market shares are less than 30%. They are considered severe restrictions on competition because they can harm consumers. In most cases, they are prohibited and it is unlikely that: That the vertical agreements they contain meet the conditions set out in Article 101, paragraph 3 of the TFUE: if it is confirmed that the contracting parties are acting at different commercial levels within the meaning of an agreement and that the agreement has an «impact on trade», the procedure for assessing the vertical agreement under Article 101 of the TFUE is, on the whole, the following: a vertical agreement is a concept used in competition law to designate agreements between companies at different levels of the supply chain. For example, a consumer electronics manufacturer could have a vertical agreement with a retailer to promote its products in exchange for lower prices. Franchising is a form of vertical agreement and, according to EU competition law, this falls within the scope of Article 101.  In addition, vertical agreements appear to be more effective in commercial activity. The most common vertical restrictions are: the regulation provides for a class exemption from Section 101, paragraph 1, of the TFUE for vertical agreements that meet certain requirements. These agreements may, for example, help a manufacturer open a new market or prevent a distributor from «driving freely» on the advertising efforts of another distributor, or allowing a supplier to devalue an investment for a given customer.
Certain requirements must be met before a particular vertical agreement is exempted from Article 101, paragraph 1 of the Treaty: Vertical agreements that meet the conditions of exemption and do not contain so-called «characterized» restrictions on competition are exempt from the ban under Article 101, paragraph 1 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union by Regulation (EC) No. 330/2010 . The main exception concerns vehicle distribution agreements which, until 31 May 2013, are subject to a three-year extension of the Council`s Regulation (EC) (EC) No. 461/2010 (Regulation (EC) No. 1400/2002 .  Although the latter regulation applies Regulation (EC) No. 330/2010 to auto repair and spare parts distribution agreements as of June 1, 2013, it also complements Regulation 330 with three additional «hardcore» clauses to determine whether a vertical agreement actually restricts competition and whether, in this case, the benefits predominate over anti-competitive effects, often depending on the market structure. However, vertical agreements may present competitive risks if .B potential to increase barriers to entry, reduce or mitigate competition, and avoid other opportunities in the event of horizontal agreements.
 Article 101, paragraph 1, of the EUTF prohibits agreements between companies with the purpose or effect of restricting, preventing or distorting competition within the Union and affecting trade between EU Member States.